You verify rows by hand. Here is what a lifetime tier changes

You already build a list company by company, checking a source for each row. What you are buying here is a way to run that search with a brief written in the open, where options and live prices sit in front of you before the work starts. That brief is the thing you review, not a finished sheet.

Four modes cover the kinds of work that appear in a lead run, and you can switch mode in the middle of a session without starting over. Lead lists rarely stay in one lane, so a search step and a write-up step can follow each other, and the switch is visible if you replay the session later.

Sessions are recorded with replay. When a client asks why a particular contact appears, you can go back through the run rather than defend a row from memory. Finished runs are saved as lessons, so a search pattern that worked is available for the next brief, still subject to your own check.

Two lifetime tiers are listed on the pricing page, Learner and Certified, and both are published on softwareprogrammer.app. Reading the cheaper tier means asking what part of your week it covers. A lead contractor's work is not one action, so a tier that carries part of the run changes how often you fall back to doing the rest by hand.

Compare the tiers by the work each one carries, not by a seat count you would apply to a team tool. You are one contractor delivering lists, so the question is whether the lower tier lets you keep the brief, the mode switch and the saved lesson for a full delivery, or whether that trail breaks partway.

A run that ends early leaves you with a partial brief and no saved lesson for the next engagement. Weigh that against a higher tier before you pay, using the live prices on the publisher's table, and decide whether the cheaper option still gives the check you need at the end.

The worry is a row you cannot defend. Anything the assistant produces can be reviewed, replayed and saved, but the trail is only as good as your check of it. If a session is cut short, the brief and the lesson are still drafts, and a client asking for a source will not accept a partially finished run as evidence.

Access happens through accounts you already hold, which keeps the work inside services you control but also means setup is yours. Payment and identity steps stay outside what the assistant will touch, so verification of the client relationship and any card detail remains with you before a list goes out.

No run is promised to finish. That is the plainest statement to absorb before paying, because lead generation is sold on delivery. Treat saved lessons as starting material for your own verification, and keep a human step at the end of every list you hand over.

Set the two tiers side by side against one real client brief. Write down the steps that brief needs, then mark which tier covers each step and which still falls to you. That comparison answers the lifetime question better than any feature list, because it measures the gap between what you hand over and what you finish alone.

The live prices on softwareprogrammer.app give you the outer frame. What you are comparing inside that frame is how much of a delivery the tier carries from brief to saved lesson, and whether replay is available for the runs you would show a client. If the cheaper tier breaks that path, the higher tier is the one that keeps your evidence intact.

Decide on the tier you can inspect, then run a small brief before committing a client's list to it. Use replay to walk through what happened, and keep the saved lesson even if the run did not fully finish. The decision is yours, and it should rest on what you can check.