Buying app builds you can put your own name on

Your client hands you a brief, and you hand back a working app carrying your brand rather than the platform's. The build covers data storage, sign-in and payment handling, so the pieces a reseller would otherwise assemble or subcontract arrive together. What you sell is the finished outcome, and the client never needs to know which engine sits behind it.

Because the work starts from a written brief, your job shifts from assembling components to writing down what the client wants clearly. You describe the screens, the records and the money flow, and the build follows that description. That suits a reseller who already runs client projects and wants one supplier for the technical part.

Your commercial model stays intact because you set what the client pays. The platform charges you for slots, and you price the delivered app to your own market. Nothing in the arrangement asks you to hand your client relationship to the platform, which is the part resellers care about most when they sign anything.

The tiers differ by how many apps you can run through them, so a smaller tier is not a weaker product but a shorter list of builds. A single-slot tier covers one client app. Resellers carrying two or three live projects at once will run out of room before the tier pays for itself.

Counting your pipeline before you choose matters more than comparing feature lists. If you expect three separate client builds over the coming period, the three-app tier matches that expectation and the one-app tier does not. Buying small and adding later means paying twice for the same intention.

There is no per-month expiry to weigh against the slot count, which changes how you plan. You are not racing a clock to fit builds in before access lapses. Instead you decide how many finished apps you want available to sell, and you buy that number once.

The common fear is a licence that forbids client work, leaving you with a tool you can only use on your own projects. Resellers build a business on delivering to other people, so a restriction on client use would make the purchase pointless. Read the terms on this point before anything else.

Complex builds go through a review step, which means a detailed brief may wait before work begins. For a reseller with a client deadline in view, that wait belongs in the schedule you quote. Straightforward builds move more directly, so the review tends to fall on the ambitious requests.

The store that sells every deal carries its own rules, and those rules sit alongside your tier. They apply to what you buy, whatever your plans for resale. Treat them as part of the purchase rather than small print, and check them against how you intend to present the app to clients.

Weigh the tiers against the number of separate client builds you can name today, not against a feature grid. One app, three apps and ten apps describe capacity, and capacity is what a reseller is really buying. Anything beyond that count is detail you cannot use until the slots exist.

Then weigh the review step against your delivery promises. If your clients accept a short wait on detailed work, the review changes little. If they expect a firm date on a complicated build, plan the buffer into the quote so the wait does not become your problem.

Finally, compare the resale terms with how you actually present work. A reseller who delivers under their own name needs the licence to allow client use, and the store rules to permit the arrangement. Once those two points read clearly, the tier choice becomes a simple count of builds.