Choosing a build platform when every client needs their own app

Think of the payment as buying finished builds rather than renting a seat each month. You describe the software you need in a written brief, and what comes back is a working web app with its data, logins and payments included. For an agency, that reframes the budget question around how many separate client tools you can deliver.

The tiers are counted in apps, not in time. A lifetime slot gives you one app to use for a client project, and the larger tiers simply give you more slots to work through. That suits a shop running outreach for six or seven clients, because each client can sit in its own build rather than sharing one tool.

Because the store on the same site sells every deal in this space, you can compare what an app costs against other offers before you commit. Nothing in the brief promises a fixed turnaround, so treat the budget as covering the build itself and plan your client timelines around the review step.

Three lifetime options are published: one app, three apps and ten apps. Each one is a count of slots rather than a length of access. The single-app tier is the natural first purchase for an agency that wants to test the process on one client before moving the rest of the roster across.

The three-app tier maps well to an agency running a handful of campaigns, letting a few clients each receive their own build. The ten-app tier is for a shop whose roster is larger or whose clients each need more than one tool, since every build consumes its own slot rather than sharing one.

What you receive is the same in each case: an app built from your written brief, with data, logins and payments included. The difference is purely how many separate builds the tier lets you request, which is the number to match against your client list before you choose.

The shared inbox worry is the one worth addressing first. Because each build is its own app with its own logins and its own data, client work does not sit in a single pooled tool. That separation is the point of buying slots rather than seats, and it is what lets you show a client where their leads came from.

The second doubt is whether a written brief is enough to get something usable. The service is built around that exchange: you describe the software, and it is shipped as a working web app. More involved briefs go through review before they ship, which is a check rather than a rejection, but it does mean a broader request takes longer to reach you.

The third doubt is control over the store side. Every deal in this space is sold through the store on the same site, and the store rules still apply to whatever you buy. Read those terms before paying so you know what governs the purchase alongside the tier you have chosen.

Upgrading is a question of slots, not of features. If your client list is growing and each new client needs a separate tool, the next tier gives you more builds to work with. If your existing slots are still unused, there is nothing to gain by moving up yet, so let the roster drive the timing.

A sensible sequence is to buy the single-app tier, run one client project through the brief and review process, and see how the finished app fits your outreach reporting. Once that pattern works, moving to three apps covers a small roster without committing to the largest option before you have tested it.

The ten-app tier is for agencies that already know the workflow suits them and have enough clients to fill the slots. Since one lifetime slot covers one app, the count is the only variable that matters. Match it to the number of separate builds you can genuinely put in front of clients.