Automate for contractors who hand clients sourced contact lists

Your money buys a single connection screen where the apps a lead list touches sit side by side. Mail, sheets, a CRM, an enrichment source and a writing tool are wired from one place instead of five separate logins, which is the part a contractor feels first when a client adds a new destination mid-project.

Work then runs inside your own accounts, so rows you assemble stay in the sheet or CRM your client can already open. You are not moving a list into a third-party dashboard to make it usable. That matters when a client asks where a contact came from and you can point at the record rather than a vendor's interface.

Guided setup walks a new sequence into place, and an activity log records what ran. For a contractor, the log is the handover artefact: it sits beside the delivered list and shows the steps taken, which is what turns a batch of rows into something a client can audit without calling you.

Three lifetime tiers are published, and the split is volume against key ownership rather than a ladder of features. Starter lifetime and Growth lifetime answer how much work you push through, while BYOK unlimited lifetime answers who pays for the model calls behind each step. Read them as two questions, not three grades.

If your month is a steady stream of client lists, the volume tiers decide how far a single purchase carries you before you feel the ceiling. If your output swings with project wins and quiet weeks, the unlimited tier with your own key lets spend follow your provider bill instead of a fixed allowance.

The tiers are lifetime purchases listed on softwareprogrammer.app. That means one payment per tier rather than a subscription that renews while you build a list, so the comparison is about which tier matches your delivery pattern. Confirm the current tier contents at the source before you commit.

The hesitation is rows a client cannot verify. A single bad contact in a delivered list costs more than the list earned, and contractors know it. The activity log and in-account running are the answer to that fear: the record of what happened stays with the work, so a disputed row can be traced rather than argued over.

That does not remove the duty to check. Automate runs the steps you set up; it does not vouch for a source you never authorised. If a contact is wrong, the sequence that produced it is the thing to inspect, and the log gives you the place to look. The platform records the process, and you own the quality of the input.

Read the limits honestly before paying. Access stops at what each connected account permits, so a client app you cannot reach stays out of scope. Steps that delete or overwrite data wait for your confirmation, so a fully unattended pipeline is not what you are buying.

Take a contractor delivering two client lists a month from a shared sheet and CRM. A volume tier covers that pattern: connect the sheet, the CRM and the writing tool, build one guided sequence, and let the activity log travel with each delivery. The purchase is made once and the monthly output stays inside the allowance.

Take a contractor whose project load doubles in some quarters and nearly stops in others. The BYOK unlimited lifetime tier fits that shape because model usage lands on your own provider key, so your bill moves with real work rather than a fixed cap. You carry the provider billing and gain headroom.

Neither tier is right in the abstract. Match the tier to how steady your delivery is and to whether you would rather manage a model key yourself. Then check the tier list on softwareprogrammer.app and pick the one whose shape your next three months resemble.