Automate for resellers and white-label partners

Your money goes on the right to run the work under your own name rather than on a login you hand over. One connection screen ties the apps together, so a client's tools sit behind your branded service and you keep the relationship. The buyer of the outcome never needs to see the machinery behind it.

Day to day the AI runs inside the accounts you already hold for a client. That matters when the client asks who touched what: the activity log records what ran, and the guided setup walks a new connection through the first sequence without you rebuilding it each time. You sell a result, and the result is traceable.

What you are really buying is repeatability. Set up the connections once, keep the sequences in your own accounts, and resell the finished work to the next client on the same tier. Volume and key ownership decide which tier fits, not a feature gate you have to climb past. The work stays inside your accounts throughout.

Tier choice comes down to two separate questions: how much work you push through, and who carries the model bill. Volume decides the first. Key ownership decides the second. Neither question is about a longer feature list, and reading the tiers as a ladder of features is what makes the choice look harder than it is.

If you resell a steady stream of client sequences, a volume tier keeps your costs predictable because the model usage sits with the platform. If your clients bring their own model keys, or you already hold provider accounts you would rather bill through, the BYOK unlimited lifetime tier moves that cost onto your own key.

For a reseller, that second choice is often the real one. You are the party invoicing the client, so you decide whether model spend is bundled into what you charge or passed through. Pick the tier that matches how you bill, then let volume settle the rest. The lifetime tiers on softwareprogrammer.app show both routes.

The worry is usually about licences: that the terms forbid you putting your own name on the work or charging clients for it. That is a fair thing to settle before you pay, because a tier you cannot resell is a tier you cannot use. Read the terms on the publisher's own page and ask directly.

The second doubt is control. If the AI runs inside accounts you hold, a client may ask what it can reach, and the honest answer is only what those accounts already permit. Where an app is restricted, a step stalls until an admin approves it. Knowing that up front lets you set expectations rather than discover them mid-project.

The third is risk of damage. Steps that would delete or overwrite data wait for your confirmation, so you cannot hand a client a sequence that rewrites records unattended. Build that pause into the timeline you promise. None of these are reasons to walk away; they are the questions to answer before the first client sequence goes live.

Take a reseller running a handful of client sequences a month and billing a flat fee. A volume tier suits this: the model cost stays with the platform, your invoice is simple, and you are not reconciling provider bills against each client. The work runs in your accounts and the activity log gives you something to show if a client asks.

Now take a partner whose clients supply their own model keys, or who already holds provider accounts and prefers to bill usage through. The BYOK unlimited lifetime tier fits because model usage lands on your own key. You carry that billing, so your margin depends on what you charge against what the provider charges you.

The split is that clean. Volume tier for a bundled, predictable invoice; BYOK tier when key ownership is yours. Either way, confirm the licence covers client use first, then choose. The tiers published on softwareprogrammer.app give you both routes to compare side by side before you commit.