SMTP mailboxes for one city, chosen by count

Your budget goes on mailboxes your team signs into and configures, each with SMTP and IMAP access and a browser webmail view for people who prefer not to use a mail client. Warm-up and authentication checks run alongside setup so sending from a new mailbox starts on firmer ground.

Nothing in the purchase adds names to your working set. The owners, developers and local decision makers you write to come from your own research in your city, so plan the tier around the sending work your team will actually do rather than around a database you hope to receive.

Payment is made once for a lifetime tier, sized by mailbox count. The published table on softwareprogrammer.app is the source for what each tier includes, and anything outside the mailbox count is priced on its own, so read that table before you commit.

Your team does not need a national list to start. A handful of mailboxes, each tied to a named agent or researcher, is enough to run a city campaign where every message has a real person behind it.

Three lifetime tiers split by mailbox count: Starter covers 5 mailboxes, Studio covers 15, and Floor covers 50. The dividing line is simply how many separate sign-ins your property team needs, not how many messages you send or how many owners you approach.

A small team of two or three people contacting owners and developers in one city usually fits Starter. If researchers, agents and a coordinator each need their own mailbox, Studio gives you more separate sign-ins without moving to the largest tier.

Floor suits a larger office where many people send under their own address and a coordinator needs room to add or reassign mailboxes over time. Check the published table for what each tier includes beyond the count before you decide.

Map your people to mailboxes first. Write down every person who will send to local decision makers, add room for one or two future joiners, and let that number pick the tier rather than a guess.

The common worry is that a mailbox service arrives with national data and no local detail. That worry is fair about data, but this product does not sell data at all, so the local detail stays in your own research either way and the mailboxes simply carry what you write.

A second doubt is whether messages will reach the inbox. Warm-up and authentication checks help, yet placement is not promised, so some mail will still land outside the inbox and your team should plan follow-up rather than a single send to each owner.

A third doubt is cost creep. Extra services carry their own price, separate from the mailbox count, so confirm what your chosen tier includes and what sits outside it before you pay anything to anyone.

None of these doubts block a city team. They only mean you should treat the mailbox as a sending tool, keep your contact research in house, and judge results over repeated contact rather than one campaign.

Take a two-person team chasing owners and developers across one city. Starter gives each person a mailbox plus spare capacity, both with SMTP, IMAP, browser webmail and the setup checks. They build their own short list of local names and write from addresses their recipients can reply to.

Take a larger office with a coordinator, three agents and a researcher. Studio covers that group with separate mailboxes and room to grow, and the coordinator can keep sending work divided by area or building type without sharing one login across the team.

Floor only makes sense once your roster of senders approaches the mailbox count or you expect steady additions. Buying above your needs does not improve placement or supply contacts, so match the tier to people first and revisit only when the team grows.

In both cases the work is the same: research local owners, write from a mailbox you own, follow up over time, and read the published table so you know exactly which services sit inside your tier.