Reselling leads without reselling someone else's login

The question you are stuck on is narrower than it looks: can you put your own label on the output and hand it to a paying client without breaking the terms? Everything else follows from that. A cheaper subscription that forbids client use costs more in the end than a lifetime tier that allows it.

Your working day is spent shaping lists a client can act on. You filter public pages and profiles by role, industry and location, enrich what you find and check the contact details before anything leaves your desk. The tool earns its place by removing that repetitive shaping, not by adding another dashboard for your client to learn.

Because you sell the outcome rather than the login, the plan you choose decides what you can promise. A tier that covers your expected volume of searches and checks lets you quote a fixed deliverable. One that does not leaves you counting credits mid-project, which is the position you are trying to avoid.

Moving up a tier does not change the shape of the work. You still filter by role, industry and location, scrape public pages and profiles, enrich contacts and verify them. What changes is how much of that work you can run before the balance forces a pause, and how many client projects you can hold at once.

Saved leads, API access and webhooks matter more to a reseller than to a single team. Saved leads let you keep a client's working set separate from the next client's. Webhooks let finished work flow into whatever you hand over. If your handover is a file or a simple integration, check that the tier you are considering includes those routes.

The published tiers are Prospector lifetime, Agency lifetime and Enterprise lifetime. The names suggest a progression from individual work to partner work, but the brief does not state what separates them beyond scale. Ask before you buy which tier explicitly permits client use and white-label handover, because that is the fact your business depends on.

Your biggest objection is licences that forbid client use, and it is the right objection to hold. A tool you cannot put in front of a client under your own name is a tool you cannot build a reseller business on. Do not accept a verbal assurance; ask for the licence terms that cover client delivery and white-label use in writing.

The second hesitation is volume. Credits are used by successful work, so an unsuccessful search costs you less than a productive one. That is reasonable, but it means your forecast should be based on finished searches and verification checks rather than attempts. Build a small test against one client niche before you commit to any tier.

The third is reliability of the output. Results depend on public data, so some niches return shorter lists than others. Verification is not permanence, so a checked address can change before your client uses it. Neither point is a reason to walk away, but both belong in what you tell clients so the deliverable is understood.

Compare Prospector lifetime with Agency lifetime first, because those are the two a reseller is most likely to weigh. Look at the licence wording for client use, the volume of successful searches and checks each tier supports, and whether saved leads and webhooks are included. The brief does not give per-tier figures, so treat the published table as the source.

Compare Agency lifetime with Enterprise lifetime only if you expect to carry several client brands at once or need a handover path that Agency does not cover. The distinction that matters is not the name but whether client use and white-label delivery are permitted at that level for the volume you expect.

Prices for all three tiers are rendered separately from the lifetime tiers published on softwareprogrammer.app, so read them there rather than from any summary. The decision you are making is whether the tier you can afford also permits the reselling you intend, and no price table answers that on its own.