Mail Pro for people who resell software under their own name

When you open the price list, you see two lifetime options rather than a monthly subscription. That shape matters because you are selling an outcome to a client and carrying the tool cost yourself. The onboarding option gives you a start with setup support, while the two-mailbox option adds sending capacity. Read each line as work you will do for a client, not as a feature you will demonstrate.

The lifetime framing means you pay once and then decide how to recover that cost across client work. For a reseller, the question is not what each tier costs in isolation but how many client engagements it takes to cover the outlay and still leave margin. Your own time for setup, copy and reporting belongs in that sum alongside the licence.

Provider limits still apply whatever tier you choose, so price your promises against the mailbox caps your clients' providers enforce. If you plan to run campaigns for several clients from one account, map the mailbox requirement first and then pick the tier that fits. The pricing page on softwareprogrammer.app is the source for the lifetime figures.

Across both tiers you get the campaign machinery: multi-step sequences with scheduling, sender rotation and warm-up, a unified reply inbox, and open, click and reply tracking. For a reseller, that mix covers the work you would otherwise stitch together from separate tools. You can build a sequence for a client, rotate senders to spread load, and watch replies arrive in one place.

The lifetime plus onboarding tier suits a reseller who needs a guided start. You get the account set up and can begin building client campaigns under your own name. The onboarding element matters when you are learning the sequence builder and want a foundation before you promise delivery dates to a client.

The lifetime plus two mailboxes tier adds sending capacity. Two mailboxes give you room to run rotation across more than one address, which matters when a client's provider caps a single mailbox. Choose this tier when your client work involves sustained sending rather than a short test. Both tiers carry the same core campaign features, so the difference is capacity and support.

The hesitation you feel is usually about licences that forbid client use. A reseller needs to know that the software can be used to deliver work for clients, not just for the reseller's own outreach. If the terms restrict client campaigns, the whole reseller model collapses, and no feature list makes up for that. Read the licence wording before you commit to a tier.

That doubt also surfaces as a question about what you can put your own name on. A white-label partner wants to present the outcome as their service, and the account structure must allow that without breaking the terms. When the licence is clear on client use, the hesitation fades and the decision becomes about capacity and onboarding rather than permission.

If the terms leave you uncertain, ask the vendor directly before paying. A written answer on client use is worth more than a demo. The doubt is a signal to check, not a reason to walk away, provided the answer confirms you can run client campaigns under your own brand.

The step up to the two-mailbox tier pays for sending capacity. For a reseller, that capacity is what lets you take on a second client without waiting for the first campaign to finish. The extra mailbox is not a feature you show a client; it is the room you need to keep work moving when one address is warming up or capped.

The onboarding tier pays for a guided start. If you are new to the sequence builder, that support shortens the gap between paying and delivering. For a white-label partner, that time saved is margin you protect on the first client engagement. Neither tier removes the need for your own copy, targeting and reporting work.

Nothing in the price covers the labour of running a client relationship: briefs, revisions, and the reporting you send each month. Those costs sit with you regardless of tier. Price your service with that labour in view, and treat the licence as one line in a larger cost of delivery.