Choosing a Scrape.Email account when you run outreach for several clients

Start with what the tier lets you keep apart. You run outreach for six or seven clients, and your biggest worry is one shared inbox that mixes them together. Read each lifetime tier by asking whether it gives you separate saved leads and separate campaign sending per client, because that separation is the product decision, not an extra.

Next, map the tier to the work you actually do. Filters by role, industry and location, public page and profile scraping, contact enrichment and verification, and API, webhooks and saved leads are the included work. A tier that covers those for your client count is the one to compare against your monthly contact volume.

Finally, treat the tier name as a label, not a promise. The published lifetime tiers are Prospector, Agency and Enterprise, and the source is the lifetime table on softwareprogrammer.app. Prices are shown there, not here. Read the table with your own client list beside it and check which tier matches the separation you need.

Prospector lifetime is the entry point to test the workflow. You can filter by role, industry and location, scrape public pages and profiles, enrich and verify contacts, and save leads. For an agency, use it to prove one client's list before you commit the whole roster, and check whether saved leads stay separate enough for your records.

Agency lifetime is the tier named for your situation, so read it against your client count. The question is whether it supports separate sending and saved leads for six or seven clients, plus API and webhooks if you push leads into a client's own tools. Contact enrichment and verification should run per client list.

Enterprise lifetime sits above that. If your agency grows past the client count the middle tier covers, or needs more credit headroom across all clients, compare it on capacity rather than features. The feature list is the same set of work; the difference is how much of it you can run before you run out.

The shared-inbox objection is really a question about data separation. When you say you do not want clients mixed together, you are asking whether saved leads, verification results and campaign sending can be kept apart inside one account. Read the tier table for that, and if it is unclear, ask before paying.

A second hesitation is proof of origin. Your goal is to show where every lead came from, so check that saved leads and scrape sources stay attached to the client they belong to. If the workspace cannot show that trail, the objection is valid and the tier is wrong for you.

The third hesitation is volume. Credits are used by successful work, so an agency running several clients will spend faster than a single sender. That is not a reason to avoid the product; it is a reason to size the tier on completed operations across all clients rather than on one campaign.

The step up from one tier to the next buys capacity, not a different product. You are paying for more room to run the same filters, scraping, enrichment, verification and campaign sending across more clients. For an agency, that means the higher tier is justified when your client list and contact volume outgrow the lower one.

Some of the price also covers the plumbing that keeps clients apart. API and webhooks let you move verified leads into each client's own tools, and saved leads let you hold a list without re-scraping it. If you need that separation, the extra tier is where you get it.

Read the lifetime table on softwareprogrammer.app with your own numbers. Estimate how many contacts you verify and how many campaigns you send per client per month, add them up, and compare that total to the tier. The price you pay should follow the work you complete, not the label on the tier.